|
Using Collections as an Effective Trade Tool
"With respect to risk, cost and cash flow—a documentary collection sits somewhere between a letter of credit and open account sales," explained Robert Long, RBS-ABN Amro Bank to attendees of FCIB's teleconference, "Using Collections as an Effective Trade Tool." "Your security under collection is in the control of the goods. That's key."
The practice of documentary collections is centuries old with the first sight and time drafts originating in the 1600s. It wasn't until the 1960s that the First National Bank of Chicago invented direct collections, with the first governing rules being published by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) in 1967 as URC 122. This regulation has been revised three times since and is currently governed by ICC Publication #522, which provides the definitions, procedures and presents the rights and responsibilities of parties to a documentary collection transaction. In the last decade, they have become "automated" and Internet-based as banks have introduced software that create collection letters and communicate with the remitting bank.
The basic procedure for the collection process begins with an agreement singed between the buyer and seller to use collection terms. The preparation of a collection letter and draft is sent overseas with the presenting bank providing a copy to the remitting bank. The presenting bank then handles the collection per instructions on the cover letter. If it is a sight collection, the presenting bank trades the documents for payment. If a time collection, the presenting bank trades documents for acceptance and a promise of payment at maturity. The presenting bank then pays the collecting/remitting bank, which then pays the exporter. According to Long, the key is that flexibility is evident in the variety of special instructions which exporters may provide to the presenting bank on the collection letter. It also provides for bank-to-bank communication.
"You can put on there, if it is part of your agreement, collect interest at X% 30 days after the on-board bill of lading date; offer the importer a discount of 1% flat if paid 20 days prior to the bill of lading. Any number of instructions or different incentives can be put on these collection letters," said Long.
There are plenty of benefits to using documentary collections, including providing control over goods until the customer either pays or signs a written undertaking to pay, making it great for new customers, and the collection process is faster and cleaner with no line-item adjustments or random deductions. They also make payments easier to identify and they have the ability to be used as a financing tool, where the document can be borrowed against or sold outright.
The drawbacks are surprise fees on collection, such as from tracing or reimbursement or other extra fees on collections which close out a bank's collection system. And the URC Rules of Protest are unclear and vague, and typically vary widely from country-to-country so are seldom used.
"Know your buyer, just like a letter of credit," advised Long. "This is not a substitute for good credit management. This is a tool for getting paid and mitigating risk. But you've got to know your buyer like everything else."
Documentary collections will likely be more widely used because, in the evolving international trade landscape, there is less reliance on letters of credit and more open account sale are covered by insurance. Banks are also showing a willingness to consider alternative financing arrangements, while continued advancements in electronic banking are making more opportunities available.
"We're seeing a slight expanded use in documentary collections, but not much. Certainly not as much as open account and open account covered by insurance," remarked Long. "Consider documentary collections as an alternative to going open account, especially if you're looking to offer extended financing arrangements to customers because more and more the bank is willing to undertake direct buyer risk."
Long said that because of the changing landscape in international trade, there is likely to be a revised version (URC #622) at some point.
Matthew Carr, NACM staff writer |